fuji xh1 vs sony a6500

Thecameras are: Fujifilm X-T2, Fujifilm GFX, Panasonic GH5S, Sony A7R II, Sony A6500, Canon EOS 5DSR, Canon EOS 5D Mark III and the Canon EOS 80D. Remember, this isn't meant to be a scientific test of the X-H1 - we don't have obvious rivals like the the Olympus O-MD E-M1 II to hand - but it does give you an idea of how it compares to cameras TheSony a6400 has a higher extended ISO, 102400, compared to the Sony 0, which provides more flexibility with low light shooting. Image via Jomaker. This speaks for itself, as the ISO range will allow for better low lighting shoots with the Sony a6400. This isn't to say that the Sony a6500 doesn't perform well in low light Vadär skillnaden mellan Sony Alpha a6500 och Fujifilm X-T10 + Fujifilm XC 16-50mm F OIS? Ta reda på vilka som är bättre och deras totala prestanda i kamerarankningen. Specifikationer + Lägg till i jämförelse. Home > Jämför kameror > Fujifilm X-T10 + Fujifilm XC 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OIS vs Sony Alpha a6500. 61 poäng. Fujifilm X FujifilmX-T3 vs. Sony Alpha a6500; Fujifilm X-T3 vs. Canon EOS M50; Fujifilm X-T3 vs. Fujifilm X-T20; Enter your screen size (diagonal) My screen size is inches. Save & close. Actual size is currently adjusted to screen. If your screen (phone, tablet, or monitor) is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly. Somethoughts on the Fuji X-H1. After a laser sharp focus on photographers with their mirrorless cameras, Fuji more recently have turned to filmmakers, videographers and people who shoot both stills and video for a living. In some ways the X-H1 monsters the Sony A6500, with 200Mbit/s is double that of Sony's cameras and competitive with mơ quan hệ với người yêu cũ. 125 características comparadasFujifilm X-H1Sony Alpha a6500Por que Fujifilm X-H1 é melhor que Sony Alpha a6500?Fotografia mais rápida em alta resolução com AF em formato JPEG?14fpsvs11fpsVelocidade máxima do obturador 50% maior?1/8000svs1/4000sTem a função timelapse? de energia a mais?1200mAhvs1100mAhTem ranhuras duplas para cartões?1 versão/versões mais recentes de USB?3vs210°C menos temperatura operacional.?-10°Cvs0°CPor que Sony Alpha a6500 é melhor que Fujifilm X-H1?100 pontos de foco a mais?425vs325Bateria com duração 40shots maior?350shotsvs310shots220g mais leve?453gvs673gTem sensor de iluminação traseira?Tem flash?Volume menor? NFC? mais estreito? EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMNikon D600 + AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm VRCanon EOS Rebel SL2 + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMFujifilm X-T30 + Fujifilm XF 18-55mm f/ R LM OISNikon D7100 + 18-105mm f/ ED VR DXCanon EOS 77D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS USMNikon Z50 + Nikon Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm f/ VRCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS M6 + Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/ IS STMAvaliações de usuáriosDesignTipo Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500O tipo de tipo de visor que a câmera dispositivo tem proteção adicional para evitar falhas causadas por poeira, pingos de chuva e respingos de maior resolução de tela permite proporciona imagens mais nítidas, aprimorando o modo como você enxerga suas fotos na EVF Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm X-H1 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500Um visor eletrônico EVF, do inglês "electronic viewfinder" de maior resolução fornece imagem mais nítida, produzindo visão de qualidade comparável à de um visor motor de foco move a lente para promover foco automático. Em câmeras profissionais, a presença de um motor de foco no corpo da câmera permite que se use vários tipos de lentes, incluindo lentes que não tenham seu próprio motor de foco. Para câmeras compactas, o motor de foco é geralmente giratórias podem ser úteis para enquadramentos uma cobertura de imagem de 100% você pode compor a imagem corretamente quando tira a foto. Com uma cobertura menor você poderá ter de cortar suas fotos depois para que fiquem maior o tamanho da tela, melhor a experiência do dos aspectos mais importantes de uma câmera é o tamanho de seu sensor. Um sensor maior irá capturar mais luz, o que resulta em melhor desempenho com pouca luz, faixa dinâmica e qualidade geral de mais pontos de foco, maior é a flexibilidade em selecionar em qual parte do cenário focar. Também dá ao sensor de imagem uma melhor probabilidade ao identificar a área correta do cenário para focar nos modos número de megapíxeis determina a resolução das imagens capturadas com a câmera principal. Um número maior indica que a câmera é capaz de capturar mais detalhes. No entanto, a quantidade de megapíxeis não é o único fator que determina a qualidade de uma maior sensibilidade à luz nível ISO, o sensor absorve mais luminosidade. O recurso pode ser utilizado para capturar imagens de objetos em movimento, usando o obturador em maior velocidade, ou para capturar imagens em ambientes de baixa luminosidade sem o uso de ISO expandido permite que você vá além do ISO base. Ele faz isso aprimorando digitalmente a saída da imagem. A imagem resultante terá menos qualidade do que quando permanecer dentro da faixa ISO base, mas pode ser útil em certas um estabilizador de imagem, o sensor de imagem e não a lente se move para compensar qualquer vibração da câmera. Isso significa que a imagem será estabilizada independentemente da lente disparo contínuo rápido é útil para capturar imagens de o rastreamento AF, uma vez escolhido o objeto e pressionado o obturador até a metade, se o objeto se mover, o foco automático irá segui-lo. Sem mais disparos fora de resolução máxima disponível para vídeos capturados com a câmera principal. Embora possa ser possível optar por outras velocidades de gravação, essas opções costumam gerar vídeos em menor sistema de focagem automática por detecção de fase é mais veloz que um sistema de focagem automática por detecção de contraste. Mesmo ao gravar cenas com muitos movimentos rápidos, os vídeos são nítidos e gravação os vídeos mantêm-se nítidos e entrada para microfone permite a conexão de microfones externos avançados ou esse conector padrão, você pode conectar a maioria dos fones de ouvido ao seu estéreo permitem a gravação de arquivos de áudio ou vídeo em sistema estéreo sem o uso de microfone função timelapse mostra uma longa passagem de tempo accelarada. Uma série de fotografias tiradas na mesma posição durante um longo período são ligadas para criar um pequeno vídeo. É uma óptima maneira de capturar coisas como o pôr-do-sol ou as nuvens a moverem-se no maior o bitrate de gravação de video melhor a qualidade do video, com mais e melhor detalhe e menos artefatos de mais microfones um dispositivo tiver, melhor a filtragem de ruídos de fundo e melhor a qualidade de gravação de som em CIPA é uma medida padrão e independente que determina quantas fotos a câmera pode tirar antes que a bateria bateria é removível e, se quebrar, pode ser trocada pelo usuárioA bateria pode ser recarregada e utilizada indicador lhe mostra quando o dispositivo está com pouca capacidade da bateria representa a quantidade de energia elétrica que uma bateria pode armazenar. Maior capacidade pode indicar maior vida útil da dispositivo pode ser conectado a redes é uma tecnologia sem fio que permite transferir dados com facilidade entre diferentes dispositivos, como smartphones, tablets e duas ranhuras para cartões de memória, permitindo que você guarde mais fotos sem precisar trocar cartões. Isto é particularmente útil em sessões de fotografia mais longas em que você precisa de mais câmera pode tirar uma série de fotografias, deslocando ligeiramente o sensor com cada uma delas. Estas podem então ser combinadas para criar uma imagem de resolução extremamente alta. É particularmente útil para coisas como fotografar obras de arquivo de imagem RAW contém dados minimamente processados a partir do sensor de imagem. Os ficheiros RAW são assim chamados porque ainda não foram processados e, portanto, ainda não estão prontos para ser impressos ou editados com um editor de imagens capaz de tirar fotos em formato lossless compressed raw. Isso tem todas as vantagens de fotografar em raw, ocupando muito menos espaço de armazenamento. O tamanho de arquivo menor também permite velocidades de leitura/gravação mais versões de Wi-Fi suportadas pelo tecnologia permite que o usuário utilize o próprio smartphone como controle remoto para o com entrada HDMI ou mini HDMI podem transferir vídeo e áudio em alta resolução para um D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VRSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSSSony Alpha a9 + Sony FE 24-70mm GMCanon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSSSony Alpha 7R III + Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario-Tessar T*Exibir tudoThis page is currently only available in English. Fujifilm X-H1Sony Alpha a6500Why is Fujifilm X-H1 better than Sony Alpha a6500? faster shooting at highest resolution with AF as JPEG format?14fpsvs11fps50% faster maximum shutter speed?1/8000svs1/4000sHas timelapse function? more battery power?1200mAhvs1100mAhHas dual card slots?1 newer USB version?3vs210°C lower potential operating temperature?-10°Cvs0°CWhy is Sony Alpha a6500 better than Fujifilm X-H1?100 more focus points?425vs32540shots longer battery life?350shotsvs310shots220g lighter?453gvs673gHas a BSI sensor?Has a flash? less body volume? NFC? narrower? EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMNikon D600 + AF-S NIKKOR 24-85mm VRCanon EOS Rebel SL2 + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMFujifilm X-T30 + Fujifilm XF 18-55mm f/ R LM OISNikon D7100 + 18-105mm f/ ED VR DXCanon EOS 77D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS USMNikon Z50 + Nikon Nikkor Z DX 16-50mm f/ VRCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS 70D + Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/ IS STMCanon EOS M6 + Canon EF-M 15-45mm f/ IS STMUser reviewsDesignType Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500The type of viewfinder EVFElectronic viewfinder EVFThe type of viewfinder that the camera device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your resolution Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Fujifilm X-H1 Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500An electronic viewfinder EVF with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually screens can be useful for tricky 100% coverage, you can compose the image correctly when you capture the photo. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking bigger the screen size is, the better the user of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor. A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image mount Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500The more focus points the more flexibility in picking which part of the scene to focus on. They also give the image sensor a better probability in identifying the right area of the scene to focus on in more automatic number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. A higher megapixel count means that the camera is capable of capturing more details. However, the megapixel count is not the only important element determining the quality of an ISO Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Fujifilm X-H1With a higher light sensitivity ISO level, the sensor absorbs more light. This can be used to capture moving objects using a fast shutter speed, or to take images in low light without using a ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. It does this by digitally enhancing the image output. The resulting image will have less quality than when staying within the native ISO range, but it can be useful in certain sensor shift, the image sensor rather than the lens moves to counterbalance any vibration of the camera. This means the image will be stabilised regardless of what lens is being continuous shooting is useful for catching action AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. No more out of focus maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and recording movies they stay focussed and microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized a standard mini jack socket, you can use the device with most stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the bitrate Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value. Sony Alpha a6500The higher the movie recording bitrate the better the movie quality with more and crispier details and less compression microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if battery can be recharged and used over indicator shows you when the device has low power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery device can connect to is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and has two memory card slots, allowing you to store more photos without switching cards. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more camera can take a series of shots, shifting the sensor slightly with each one. These can then be combined to create an extremely high-resolution image. It’s particularly useful for things like photographing raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics is capable of shooting stills in a lossless compressed raw format. This has all the advantages of shooting raw, while taking up much less storage space. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write Wi-Fi versions supported by the technology allows the users to use their smartphone as a remote control for the with a HDMI or mini HDMI port can transfer high definition video and audio to a D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VRSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSSSony Alpha a9 + Sony FE 24-70mm GMCanon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/3__5-5__6 OSSSony Alpha 7R III + Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario-Tessar T*Show allThis page is currently only available in English. Let’s compare the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500. Our comparison table below covers all the important specifications of each camera. Fujifilm has unveiled the X-H1 mirrorless camera with megapixel APS-C sized X-Trans CMOS III sensor and X-Processor Pro image processing engine. Even the new X-H1 has the same sensor in resolution to the Sony A6500, it has a significantly larger and heavier body. In our opinion, the X-H1 is quite expensive. Do you think that the X-H1, with the price tag of only $1,900, offers enough features against the A6500? The Fujifilm X-H1 is the company’s highest performance APS-C model with most video-capable features. It’s based on the X-T2 but adds in-body image stabilization as well as DCI 4K and more comprehensive set of video options. If you’re trying to decide which one to buy as your first camera, check out the differences between the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Specifications Comparison of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 Cameras Below you can see the specs comparison table of Fujifilm X-H1 vs Sony A6500 cameras. Some differences like sensor, image size, shooting speed, lcd size etc.. detailed as bold on the table. Fujifilm X-H1 Sony A6500 Sensor resolution 24MP 24MP Sensor size APS-C APS-C Image Stablization 5-axis, 5-axis Burst speed 14 fps with e-shutter, 8 fps mechanical 11 with grip 11 fps AF Joystick? 8-way No Touchscreen Yes Yes Screen articulation Two-axis tilt Tilt EVF dots dots Viewfinder magnification RAW buffer 40 231 JPEG buffer 27 110 Video Bit depth 8 8 Max bitrate 200 Mbps 100 Mbps Mic / Headphone sockets? Yes / On VPB-XH1 accessory grip Yes / No Log capture? Yes Yes HDMI Micro Micro USB Micro Type B Micro Type B Battery life CIPA 310 310 Dimensions x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Weight with card and battery 673g 453g Price body only $1,900 $1,298 FUJIFILM X-H1 advantages over Fujifilm X-T2 In-body image stabilization – Yes Reduces the effects of camera shake at slower shutter speeds Higher Max Flash Sync Reduce the effect of ambient light in flash shots Dual Card Slots – Yes Always-on wireless connectivity Top Deck Display – Yes Check settings with a screen on top of the camera Faster burst rate 14fps vs 11 fps Faster Shutter Speed 1/32000 vs 1/4000 sec Sony A6500 advantages over FUJIFILM X-H1 Less Expensive – Save money for lenses or accessories Built-in NFC Yes Internal Flash Yes Thinner and Lighter Bigger JPEG and RAW Buffer February 17, 2018Cameras4K, camera, comparison, fujifilm, Fujifilm X-H1, hybrid, Mirrorless, sensor, Sony, video Two years ago, Fujifilm announced its most popular X-Series camera to date, the X-T2. It was one of many “second generation” mirrorless cameras to hit the market that year and included characteristics one would expect from a high-end product such as a more robust housing, an improved autofocus system and 4K video. The recently announced Fujifilm X-H1 is built upon the strengths of the X-T2, making it the most powerful X-Series camera in the range. In this comparison preview, we’re going to take a look at how the new X-H1 compares to one of its main rivals on the mirrorless market, the Sony a6500. Despite sharing similar characteristics, including a 24MP APS-C sensor, advanced hybrid autofocus system, 5-axis sensor stabilisation and advanced video capabilities, there are quite a few ways in which they differ as we’ll discover below. … Read full post here 1 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Last edited Jun 15, 2019 2 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Thanks for the research! 3 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed 4 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed Thanks so much Chuck and Shadowside Crop? I'm very poor in math, so bare with me here First I scale the original down from 6000px to 3000px in photoshop then copy and paste those images in 1600px X 1607px new document to post in here at 100% 5 To my eyes, the Sony with NR looks the best. 6 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. This subject is already waxy, so no real harm done. But, what this test does reveal well is how the noise has been handled in the mid-tone areas and in retaining a lot of the details in the beads and around the eyes. All in, very impressive how far along this technology has come. 7 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light 8 +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC 9 What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. Last edited Jun 15, 2019 10 Huge diff in sharpness 11 I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC Because, ppl call them kit lens, does not mean, they are equal. What you can get for $150? Waste of money. 12 The Sony lens looks pretty sharp to me. Both cameras performed really good here IMO. 13 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. 14 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me 15 Just for curious, I went and take a shot at 1/6s yes still hand held Still holding its sharpness, crazy little camera Last edited Jun 16, 2019 16 That's really impressive for hand held but I do see some softness in that image of I pixel peep. 17 Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me Amazing! Hoping Fuji will eventually figure out a way to offer IBIS in some of their smaller, more affordable bodies. 18 Aww, man, Alisa? Pfft. You gotta get some Julia or Zafina in there, stat. Good on you for doing a second test without the Sony multi-frame NR. It does go to show how much work the software is doing. But hey, you're getting the results you want and that's what matters. Still, now use that feature on a tripod and you'll really blow peoples' minds. What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. It's not so much a different "scale" as it is that camera ISOs are poorly-defined in the first place and to account for manufacturing tolerances any manufacturer is allowed to label pretty much any ISO whatever they like, which they all abuse; Fuji just abuse that chance even more than the others. Except the Canon 80D, which is an almost exact copy, ISO-wise, of Fuji. Of course in this example the lens is different, too, and there could be different transmission even at the same aperture, further exaggerating the difference in exposure. But all that only matters when you are comparing two different cameras directly head-to-head like this and you're trying to match your results by copying the numbers. For 'real' shooting you can just use your eyes, forget the numbers even exist at all, and just shift stuff up or down until it looks right. 'S what I do most of the time, to be honest. Sticking the camera on auto ISO and then just using exposure compensation to get the brightness looking right on the screen, ignoring what ISO number the camera claims to be using, is a big headache-saver. I never mix systems in a shoot so Fuji's massive over-valuing of their ISO ratings doesn't actually cause a problem.

fuji xh1 vs sony a6500